Liberty New Media

VOTE!

Best of the Best GOP Campaign Websites 2010
Social Internet... Where are the Republicans? PDF Print E-mail
Sunday, 08 February 2009 18:20
By Thomas Lee

Technology determines winners. This is one of the fundamental lessons I learned from my years studying Economic History. Whether we’re talking about war, business, or politics, the results tend to be the same:  whichever side in a conflict has the broadest access to the most advanced technology tends to dominate the opposing group.

We are currently experiencing a rapid evolution in communications technology. The ways people communicate with one another and share ideas is changing dramatically. The revolution is here. It is happening right now as I write this and mostly likely continuing while you read this.

Politics in a democracy is about the communication of competing ideas. People debate the merits of these ideas and the most convincing proposals rise to the top. In theory, the best people get elected, the best bills get enacted, and the best ideas get put into practice.  

The rapidly evolving landscape of communications technology creates the possibility for distortions in the democratic process. If one political party in a two party political system had technological superiority over their competition, they would be able to dominate the political environment.  

The bad news is that currently, the Democrats have technological superiority over us. As long as they do, they will have a tremendous advantage over Republicans in the political arena.   Democrat candidates and ideas will have the upper hand in competitive races-even if their candidates are less qualified and their ideas are weaker than the competing ideas of Republicans. Why? Because with greater access to communications technology, Democrats will be able to out maneuver, out politick, out organize, and out-convince Republicans every step of the way.     

In 2008, Barack Obama gathered together over 5 million supporters on his Facebook page. In comparison, John McCain’s Facebook page had barely half a million. More importantly than this numerical difference, Obama’s team utilized the power of facebook and other social media to a much greater extent than McCain’s camp. The most fundamental difference was that Obama campaigned through social media and used it as a means to convince people to support him, whereas McCain and virtually all other campaigns have a tendency to treat social media as a means of gathering followers and then funneling them into offline campaign activities.   

The Republican Party, its elected officials and its grass roots leaders need to play catch up. This is going to require a dramatic change in how we communicate with one another by utilizing the Social Web.

Two things need to happen. First, our party leadership needs to make an effort to keep up to date with the latest advancements in communications technology. Second, Republican voters and grassroots activists need to get in the habit of using the Social Web. These tools will only help the Republican Party, if voters and activists get online en mass. The eStampede Project is dedicated to bringing Republicans online and getting them connected.  More to follow….

 

Comments  

 
0 #16 mypoliticalopinions. 2010-01-30 18:11
Speak up America...

http://tinyurl.com/m7cjgn

This is a new political on-line community where you can share your
opinions, videos etc.
Quote
 
 
0 #15 RepublicanRedhead 2010-01-30 18:10
I completely agree. I get sooo frustrated because in my community I belong to a Republican womens club, a
neighborhood tea party and a county tea party and NONE of them Tweet! They just send extremely dry black and white
emails. They do have an online community but it's ridiculously un-user friendly. When the tools already exist, why
try and reinvent the wheel?
Quote
 
 
0 #14 Cheryl Ruder 2010-01-30 18:10
Used to be democrat then 4 years ago I wised up and became conservative and have been voting republican ever since.
Now I want to say I am independent. I'm totally turned off by congress in general. I will be picking and choosing
carefully from now on who I vote for. Leaders who believe in freedom and the constitution. Those who believe in
less govt. and not a nanny state. Can't wait to vote in 2010.
Quote
 
 
0 #13 delbertino 2010-01-30 18:10
Now is your chance; media is exposed as collection of tools for communist agenda. Media kills you off with phrases
like "Mean spirited". No guts for fight with media; internet knows "television" is shit. When do
you think Republicans will stop playing their game on their turf. Media is the culprit. Media is the source of
poison. Media is vulnerable to truth; as is traitor in chief pimp meister
Quote
 
 
0 #12 delbertino 2010-01-30 18:09
Limbaugh said years ago that he would not discuss Israel or congress. I no longer took him seriously. Limbaugh is
halfway: media and conservative; impossible. Media is the source of the problem. Referendum and petition; people,
not castrated congress. They love the fed; they are bound by campaign loan obligations. Kill off media with social
internet. Obama is the serpent
Quote
 
 
0 #11 delbertino 2010-01-30 18:09
Its time to lock and load. Screw the codicils; this guy is putting US in a vice. He's selling everything; he is a
traitor. He compromises our sons and daughters of the military. Obama is a liar and muslim and sympathetic to
Jihadists that swear our destruction. Obama is the enemy in a media suit.
Quote
 
 
0 #10 Bob Mueller 2010-01-30 18:09
I agree with alot in the posting, but not everything. I agree, that the Dems have the GOP out matched with their
ability to campaign online. And the GOP should make a coordinated, significant effort to reach out to voters in
the new media of blogs, twitter, facebook, etc.

HOWEVER, the victorious are not victorious ONLY through the use of
better technology. The better technology will only carry your message so far. The content of the message is FAR
more important then the medium in which the message is carried. If the GOP thinks that it can continue its current
legislative path of government growth, spending increases, trying to tell people how to live their lives, and
pandering to the left to get them to like us, it does not matter which media we utilize to communicate the message.
The GOP will continue to fail at the polls. The GOP must embrace the ideas of conservatism, campaign on a
platform of less government, reduced spending, and letting people take responsibility (and power) over their own
lives. After they campaign on that platform, they must also prove to their constituents that they will execute
these ideals in office. Once the message is an effective message, then we can start utlizing the available media's
to carry the message.

I can think of numerous historical examples, where inferior technology has beaten superior
technology. When the inferior technology is applied in a better fashion. I think that discussion is outside the
scope of this comment.

I use facebook, and I did not friend John McCain, the same reason that I did not send him
money for his campaign. I did not support his plaform or his message. I did vote for him, but that is where my
support stopped.

The GOP has a much larger credibility problem with the voters, then it does a technology problem.
Technology continues to be a problem, and I would like to see the GOP embrace new technology and utilize it more
effectively. But that is not the underlying problem. The train has left the station, but I think we can catch up,
if we carry the right message.
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh